AI Model Governance That Prevents Risk
Create governance systems to track decisions, detect bias, and maintain compliance, helping AI projects avoid regulatory and reputational risks.
👋 Talk to a governance expert.
Trusted and top rated tech team
AI models create regulatory and reputational risk
Models make decisions affecting customers but lack audit trails explaining outcomes. Bias goes undetected until public incidents occur, compliance documentation doesn’t exist for regulators, and teams can’t explain model behavior during audits. We implement governance frameworks with bias monitoring, explainability tools, and compliance tracking so AI systems meet regulatory requirements and maintain audit readiness without blocking deployment velocity.
Our capabilities include:
- Bias detection and fairness monitoring systems
- Model explainability and audit trail documentation
- Compliance framework implementation (GDPR, HIPAA, AI Act)
- Risk assessment and classification processes
- Model lineage and version tracking
- Automated governance policy enforcement
Who we support
AI governance shouldn’t wait until regulators ask questions. We help organizations implement governance infrastructure with bias monitoring and compliance tracking so models meet regulatory requirements before deployment.
Regulated Industries Deploying AI
Your healthcare, finance, or government models must meet strict compliance requirements but governance processes don't exist. Legal teams can't assess AI risk, auditors request documentation you can't provide, and deployment delays while teams build compliance frameworks manually.
Companies Facing Bias Risk
Your models make decisions affecting customers but bias testing happens reactively after incidents. No systematic fairness monitoring exists, protected attributes aren't tracked, and reputational damage occurs before technical teams detect discriminatory patterns in production.
Organizations Preparing for AI Regulations
Your AI systems must comply with emerging regulations like the EU AI Act but compliance strategy doesn't exist. Risk classifications aren't assigned, technical documentation requirements aren't clear, and deployment timelines depend on regulatory interpretation your team lacks.
Ways to engage
We offer a wide range of engagement models to meet our clients’ needs. From hourly consultation to fully managed solutions, our engagement models are designed to be flexible and customizable.
Staff Augmentation
Get access to on-demand product and engineering team talent that gives your company the flexibility to scale up and down as business needs ebb and flow.
Retainer Services
Retainers are perfect for companies that have a fully built product in maintenance mode. We'll give you peace of mind by keeping your software running, secure, and up to date.
Project Engagement
Project-based contracts that can range from small-scale audit and strategy sessions to more intricate replatforming or build from scratch initiatives.
We'll spec out a custom engagement model for you
Invested in creating success and defining new standards
At Curotec, we do more than deliver cutting-edge solutions — we build lasting partnerships. It’s the trust and collaboration we foster with our clients that make CEOs, CTOs, and CMOs consistently choose Curotec as their go-to partner.
Why choose Curotec for AI model governance?
Our engineers implement bias monitoring dashboards, build explainability reporting systems, and configure compliance documentation workflows. We establish model risk classifications, create audit trail infrastructure, and integrate governance checks into deployment pipelines. You get operational governance that meets regulatory requirements without hiring compliance specialists or blocking model releases.
1
Extraordinary people, exceptional outcomes
Our outstanding team represents our greatest asset. With business acumen, we translate objectives into solutions. Intellectual agility drives efficient software development problem-solving. Superior communication ensures seamless teamwork integration.
2
Deep technical expertise
We don’t claim to be experts in every framework and language. Instead, we focus on the tech ecosystems in which we excel, selecting engagements that align with our competencies for optimal results. Moreover, we offer pre-developed components and scaffolding to save you time and money.
3
Balancing innovation with practicality
We stay ahead of industry trends and innovations, avoiding the hype of every new technology fad. Focusing on innovations with real commercial potential, we guide you through the ever-changing tech landscape, helping you embrace proven technologies and cutting-edge advancements.
4
Flexibility in our approach
We offer a range of flexible working arrangements to meet your specific needs. Whether you prefer our end-to-end project delivery, embedding our experts within your teams, or consulting and retainer options, we have a solution designed to suit you.
AI governance capabilities for compliant models
Bias Testing Pipeline Configuration
SHAP Explainability Integration
Compliance Documentation Automation
Model Risk Classification Framework
Audit Trail Infrastructure
Policy-as-Code Enforcement
Technologies for governance and compliance
Bias Detection & Fairness Testing
We implement fairness testing tools measuring disparate impact, demographic parity, and protected attribute influence systematically.
- Fairlearn — Microsoft framework assessing and mitigating unfairness in ML models with constraint-based optimization algorithms
- AI Fairness 360 — IBM toolkit providing 70+ fairness metrics and bias mitigation algorithms across the ML lifecycle
- Aequitas — Bias audit toolkit from UChicago measuring fairness across multiple demographic groups with visualization dashboards
- What-If Tool — Google interactive interface exploring model behavior, testing counterfactuals, and identifying fairness issues visually
- Themis ML — Python library implementing fairness-aware machine learning algorithms preventing discriminatory predictions
- FairML — Auditing tool quantifying relative significance of inputs in black-box predictive models for bias assessment
Model Explainability & Interpretability
Explainability platforms generate feature importance reports, decision explanations, and counterfactual analyses for audit teams.
- SHAP — Framework calculating Shapley values explaining individual predictions with consistent feature attribution across model types
- LIME — Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations creating simple approximations of complex model decisions for humans
- InterpretML — Microsoft toolkit providing model-agnostic and glass-box interpretability with interactive visualization capabilities
- Alibi — Seldon open-source library offering counterfactual explanations, anchor explanations, and contrastive reasoning tools
- ELI5 — Python library visualizing and debugging ML models with feature importance explanations and prediction breakdowns
- Captum — PyTorch library providing attribution algorithms explaining neural network predictions through gradient-based methods
Model Documentation & Registry
Curotec deploys model registries tracking versions, metadata, lineage, and compliance artifacts throughout the ML lifecycle.
- MLflow Model Registry — Centralized hub managing model versions, stage transitions, and annotations with approval workflows
- DVC — Data version control system tracking datasets, models, and experiments with Git-like versioning capabilities
- Pachyderm — Data lineage platform providing complete provenance tracking from raw data through model training to predictions
- ModelDB — Open-source system versioning machine learning models, datasets, and configurations with experiment comparison features
- Verta — Enterprise model registry managing deployment metadata, compliance documentation, and operational model monitoring
- Neptune Model Registry — Metadata store organizing production models with version control and collaboration features for teams
Compliance & Regulatory Documentation
Documentation platforms auto-generate model cards, datasheets, and compliance reports meeting regulatory submission requirements.
- Model Cards Toolkit — Google framework creating standardized documentation describing model performance, limitations, and intended use cases
- VerifyML — Automated compliance documentation generator producing AI factsheets and technical reports for regulatory review
- Fiddler AI Explainability — Enterprise platform generating model documentation, performance reports, and compliance artifacts automatically
- Aporia — ML observability tool creating governance reports, compliance dashboards, and model behavior documentation
- Arthur AI — Model monitoring platform producing compliance documentation tracking fairness, performance, and data drift metrics
- Galileo — ML quality platform generating model evaluation reports, error analysis, and compliance documentation for audits
Policy Enforcement & Access Control
Our engineers configure policy engines enforcing governance rules, approval workflows, and role-based access across ML systems.
- Open Policy Agent — Cloud-native policy engine defining and enforcing governance rules as code across infrastructure
- HashiCorp Sentinel — Policy-as-code framework embedding compliance checks into deployment pipelines with fine-grained control
- Styra DAS — Declarative authorization service managing policy enforcement across microservices and ML systems centrally
- AWS IAM — Identity and access management service controlling permissions for model training, deployment, and inference operations
- Google Cloud IAM — Access control system managing who can deploy, update, or query ML models with audit logging
- Azure RBAC — Role-based access control defining permissions for machine learning workspaces, datasets, and model endpoints
Audit Trail & Model Monitoring
Monitoring systems log predictions, track data drift, and capture decision metadata enabling audit teams to investigate issues.
- WhyLabs — AI observability platform tracking data quality, model performance, and prediction patterns without accessing raw data
- Arize AI — ML monitoring tool logging predictions with metadata enabling root cause analysis during compliance investigations
- Fiddler — Model monitoring platform capturing prediction explanations, fairness metrics, and performance data for audit trails
- Datadog ML Monitoring — Observability tool tracking model predictions, latency, and errors with full-stack trace correlation
- Evidently AI — Monitoring framework detecting data drift, model degradation, and prediction issues with automated reporting
- TruEra — Model intelligence platform monitoring fairness, quality, and explanations with audit-ready reporting capabilities
FAQs about our AI model governance services
What regulations does AI governance address?
We implement frameworks meeting GDPR, HIPAA, EU AI Act, and NIST AI RMF requirements. Our systems document model behavior, track data lineage, and generate compliance reports for regulatory submissions. We adapt governance controls to your industry’s specific requirements and audit expectations.
How do you detect bias in production models?
We deploy automated testing measuring disparate impact, demographic parity, and equal opportunity across protected attributes. Monitoring dashboards track fairness metrics continuously, alerting teams when bias thresholds are exceeded. We test both during development and in production environments.
What's included in model documentation?
We generate model cards documenting intended use, training data sources, performance metrics, fairness testing results, and known limitations. Documentation includes explainability reports, risk classifications, and lineage tracking meeting regulatory requirements for AI system transparency.
Can governance integrate with existing ML workflows?
Yes. We embed governance checks into your CI/CD pipelines, model registries, and deployment processes without disrupting data science workflows. Policy enforcement happens automatically during model promotion, blocking releases that fail compliance requirements.
How long does governance implementation take?
Basic bias testing and documentation systems take 6-8 weeks. Comprehensive governance with policy enforcement, audit trails, and regulatory compliance takes 3-5 months depending on model complexity and compliance requirements. We deliver incrementally so teams maintain deployment velocity.
Do we need dedicated governance staff?
No. We build governance systems operating automatically within existing workflows. Data scientists and engineers use governance tools without specialized compliance knowledge. We provide training and documentation, but systems run without dedicated governance personnel.
Ready to have a conversation?
We’re here to discuss how we can partner, sharing our knowledge and experience for your product development needs. Get started driving your business forward.