Why This Question Keeps Coming Up

Over the past year, we’ve spoken with several prospects who are still running WordPress sites built with WPBakery. In almost every case, WPBakery wasn’t a deliberate choice—it came bundled with a theme or was selected years ago by a previous agency.

What’s consistent is how those teams feel about it now.

They already suspect WPBakery is outdated. They’ve heard Elementor is newer and easier to use. And they can tell their current setup feels harder to manage than it should be. What they don’t have is clarity about the real trade-offs—or a safe way to migrate without breaking their site.

This post is meant to clarify that decision. If you’re planning a rebuild, a redesign, or any form of WordPress development, your choice of page builder is not a cosmetic decision. It’s an architectural one.

What WPBakery and Elementor Actually Are

WPBakery and Elementor are both visual page builders for WordPress, but they come from very different generations of WordPress development.

WPBakery is one of the earliest mainstream page builders. It became popular largely because it was bundled into many commercial themes. Under the hood, it stores content using shortcodes—small instruction tags that tell WordPress how to render each part of a page.

Elementor represents a newer generation of builders. It uses a true front-end visual editor and stores content in a much cleaner structure that’s closer to native WordPress and standard HTML.

WPBakery still exists for one main reason: legacy. Thousands of sites were built with WPBakery years ago, and many teams have kept what they inherited.

From a modern web development standpoint, however, the two builders create very different long-term outcomes.

The Developer Experience and Build Speed Reality

One of the most immediate differences between WPBakery and Elementor shows up in development time. In real project work, WPBakery builds typically take 20–30% more development time than comparable Elementor builds. That gap exists for a few reasons:

  • WPBakery’s interface is slower and more rigid
  • Layout adjustments require more manual tuning
  • Reusable templates and global styling are weaker
  • The editing experience is less intuitive for modern workflows

Elementor, by contrast, makes it faster to:

  • Build and adjust layouts visually
  • Create reusable templates and sections
  • Apply consistent spacing and styling
  • Iterate quickly during client feedback cycles

From a business perspective, this difference matters. Longer build times mean higher development costs, slower turnaround, and more friction during revisions. When teams engage Curotec for WordPress rebuilds or redesigns, this build-time difference alone is often enough to justify moving to Elementor.

The Biggest Technical Trap Shortcode Lock-In

This is the single most important technical difference between WPBakery and Elementor. WPBakery stores content as shortcodes. That means your pages are not really made of normal text and HTML. They’re made of WPBakery instructions.

For example, even a simple block of text might be stored like this:

What this actually means

That line isn’t your content. It’s a set of instructions telling WPBakery how to generate your content. As long as WPBakery is installed, everything looks fine. But the moment the plugin is removed, WordPress no longer knows how to interpret those instructions.

What happens if you remove WPBakery

  • Your content effectively disappears from the front end
  • Pages are replaced by walls of raw shortcode text
  • The site becomes unreadable and unusable without cleanup

What happens if you remove Elementor

  • Your layout and styling are lost
  • But your text usually remains readable
  • Your content still exists in a usable form

This difference is called shortcode lock-in, and it has long-term consequences. It affects:

  • How hard it is to change themes later
  • How hard it is to switch builders
  • How risky future migrations become
  • How much technical debt your site accumulates over time

In practical terms, WPBakery makes your content much harder to escape from. For teams thinking about future redesigns, performance upgrades, or application modernization, this lock-in becomes a hidden but very real liability.

WPBakery vs. Elementor At a Glance

Feature
WPBakery
Elementor
Builder generation
Older legacy builder
Modern visual builder
Editing experience
Back-end oriented with limited front-end preview
True front-end visual editing
Content storage
Shortcodes like [vc_column][vc_text]
Clean structured data closer to HTML
What happens if removed
Content breaks into raw shortcodes
Text usually remains readable
Migration friendliness
Poor
Much better
Development speed
Slower builds
Faster builds
Long-term maintainability
Lower
Higher
Theme ecosystem
Often bundled into older themes
Wide support across modern themes
Best-fit use case
Legacy sites locked into older themes
New builds and modern rebuilds

👋 Not sure whether to stay on WPBakery or move to Elementor?

Share a few details about your site and goals. We’ll review your setup and outline a practical path forward.

LEAD – Request for Service

Trusted by tech leaders at:

Theme Compatibility Reality Total vs. Astra vs. Hello

Most prospects don’t realize that the page builder choice isn’t independent. It’s tightly coupled to your theme. One of the most common examples we see is the Total theme.

Total theme and WPBakery

The Total theme works better with WPBakery. Many of its customizer settings, layout controls, and built-in templates were designed specifically around WPBakery’s architecture. When teams try to pair Total with Elementor:

  • Some customizer settings don’t apply correctly
  • Layout options behave inconsistently
  • Template compatibility becomes limited

So if you’re already locked into the Total theme, WPBakery may be the least painful short-term path.

Why this still isn’t ideal long-term

Staying on Total + WPBakery:

  • Preserves shortcode lock-in
  • Extends technical debt
  • Limits future flexibility
  • Makes future migrations harder and more expensive

Curotec’s preferred modern stack

For new builds and rebuilds, we strongly prefer:

  • Astra theme or Hello Elementor
  • Elementor as the primary page builder

This combination creates:

  • Cleaner content storage
  • Faster development cycles
  • Easier long-term maintenance
  • Much safer future migrations

In practice, we only recommend WPBakery when a theme forces it. And we generally avoid choosing themes that force WPBakery unless there’s a very specific business reason.

Why Most Clients Should Not Start a New Site on WPBakery

From a modern WordPress architecture standpoint, WPBakery creates structural disadvantages. The core downsides include:

  • 20–30% longer build times
  • Shortcode lock-in
  • Poor migration story
  • Higher long-term technical debt

Yet many clients still end up with WPBakery because:

  • It came bundled with a theme
  • A previous agency defaulted to it
  • No one explained the long-term trade-offs

For most organizations, starting a new site on WPBakery today simply doesn’t make sense—especially if the site is meant to support growth, lead generation, or ongoing content marketing.

When WPBakery Might Still Be the Right Choice

There are scenarios in which WPBakery remains defensible. For example:

  • You already have a large WPBakery site in production
  • You are deeply customized into the Total theme
  • You don’t have the budget or timeline for a rebuild
  • You cannot risk layout regressions right now

In those cases, the smart move is often:

  • Stabilize the existing site
  • Avoid new structural changes
  • Plan a phased migration later
  • Don’t double down on WPBakery long-term

Practical Decision Guide

Choose WPBakery if:

  • You are locked into the Total theme
  • You cannot migrate right now
  • You accept long-term technical debt

Choose Elementor if:

  • You are starting a new site
  • You want faster builds and edits
  • You want clean content storage
  • You want easier future migrations
  • You plan to use Astra or Hello Elementor

Migration Reality: Why Switching Isn’t Trivial

Many prospects assume they can “just switch builders.” In reality:

  • WPBakery layouts do not translate automatically to Elementor
  • Shortcodes must be stripped or rebuilt
  • Layouts must be reconstructed manually
  • Spacing and template logic changes
  • QA and regression testing are required

A real migration usually involves:

  • Content extraction and cleanup
  • Theme replacement or refactoring
  • Layout rebuilding in Elementor
  • SEO and performance validation

This is why most teams can’t safely migrate without experienced help—especially when traffic, rankings, and conversions are on the line.

How Curotec Helps

Curotec works with teams at every stage of this decision. We help clients:

  • Audit existing WordPress sites
  • Evaluate theme and builder constraints
  • Migrate from WPBakery to Elementor
  • Select a future-proof WordPress architecture

Our goal isn’t just to rebuild pages. It’s to help teams avoid locking themselves into decisions that quietly increase cost and risk over time. Whether you’re planning a rebuild, a redesign, or a broader application modernization initiative, we focus on long-term flexibility—not short-term convenience.

WPBakery isn’t just “older.” It creates structural lock-in and long-term costs that most teams don’t see until it’s too late. The cheapest decision today often becomes the most expensive decision later.

When it comes to WordPress, builder and theme choices are architecture decisions—not cosmetic ones. If you’re currently running WPBakery or deciding between WPBakery and Elementor, Curotec can help evaluate your site, your theme constraints, and your long-term goals to recommend the cleanest, lowest-risk path forward. Contact us for guidance on your WordPress setup.